This article is part of David Leonhardt’s newsletter. You can sign up here to receive it each weekday.
For anyone worried about climate change, Jerry Taylor is an intriguing figure.
He “spent years as a professional climate denier at the Cato Institute, arguing against climate science, regulations, and treaties in op-eds, speeches, and media appearances,” the MIT Technology Review explained. Taylor’s view, as he told Vox’s David Roberts, was that “it’s unclear how big a problem it is, there’s a lot of uncertainty, and there’s probably more of a chance that it’s going to be a relative non-problem than it will be a problem.”
But then Taylor began to change his mind.
First, he was willing to continue reading the scientific evidence with an open mind. And it became strong enough to persuade him. “While one can do some gymnastics to continue to defend the ‘there’s nothing to see here, folks’ argument, it became harder and harder,” he told Roberts.
Second, he was influenced by a couple of arguments from other conservatives — much as I hope that his own arguments may now persuade still other conservatives. One argument pointed out that climate change damages private property and impinges on people’s freedom. Another came from the risk-management ideas of Wall Street — that even small risks with terrible potential consequences must be taken seriously.
“If this sort of risk were to arise in any other context in the private markets, people would pay real money to hedge against it,” Taylor said.
In 2014 Taylor founded the Niskanen Center, which is doing important work imagining what a healthy conservative party could look like in this country. (David Brooks and New York Magazine’s Jonathan Chait have written more broadly about Niskanen’s work.) Having a non-destructive climate policy is, of course, a big part of the answer.
For anyone looking for other conservatives making the case for climate action, try:
Kathleen Parker of The Washington Post, who — perhaps not coincidentally — is based in the coastal state of South Carolina. “Make no mistake,” she wrote after Hurricane Harvey battered Texas. “We are being warned.”
Debbie Dooley, a pro-Trump conservative whom The Times has profiled.
Students for Carbon Dividends, a group with multiple college chapters.
Several of these conservatives think a carbon tax is more politically realistic than I do. Taylor, for example, makes the case for such a tax in his recent critique of the Green New Deal. But I’ll say this: If the conservatives who are worried about the climate can win enough Republicans to their side, a carbon tax may become more feasible than it is today. That would be very good news.
Our biggest disagreement
I thought of Taylor this week, because my colleague Ross Douthat suggested we devote another segment of “The Argument” podcast to climate change. He did so after I told him that it had been the hardest subject for me to discuss with him. On many other subjects — health care, religion, abortion, criminal justice and more — I understand where Ross is coming from even when I disagree with him. But I don’t understand how someone as smart as he is can be blasé about climate change.
In this follow-up conversation, we managed to find more common ground, just as he predicted. If you listen and have thoughts, send me an email at firstname.lastname@example.org.
If you are not a subscriber to this newsletter, you can subscribe here. You can also join me on Twitter (@DLeonhardt) and Facebook.
Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.
二码和八数【这】【是】【一】【个】【奇】【特】【的】【要】【求】，【若】【是】【往】【日】，【莲】【花】【绝】【不】【会】【答】【应】，【但】【此】【际】【却】【关】【系】【到】【登】【上】【宝】【塔】【顶】【端】【的】【事】【宜】。 【剑】【在】【手】【中】【横】【卧】，【缓】【缓】【出】【鞘】。【当】【剑】【身】【完】【全】【出】【鞘】【之】【时】，【剑】【花】【见】【长】【剑】【平】【举】，【高】【声】【道】：“【前】【辈】，【得】【罪】【了】！” 【半】【步】【融】【魂】【的】【气】【息】【瞬】【间】【爆】【发】，【武】【魂】【莲】【花】【浮】【现】。 【许】【墨】【曾】【经】【说】【过】，【莲】【花】【的】【剑】【是】【他】【所】【见】【过】【的】【最】【绚】【烂】【的】【剑】【法】，【或】【许】【不】【是】【最】
【唐】【蜜】【潜】【心】【写】【了】【一】【星】【期】【的】【婚】【礼】【策】【划】，【之】【后】【又】【是】【十】【天】【的】【起】【早】【贪】【黑】【的】【准】【备】，【终】【于】【到】【了】【正】【式】【举】【行】【婚】【礼】【的】【日】【子】【了】。 【薛】【梅】【还】【是】【第】【一】【次】【见】【到】【自】【己】【的】【婚】【纱】，【淡】【淡】【的】【蓝】【色】，【优】【雅】【之】【中】【带】【着】【几】【分】【活】【泼】。 “【逸】【凝】，【谢】【谢】【你】。”【薛】【梅】【望】【着】【镜】【子】【里】【的】【自】【己】，【自】【己】【都】【惊】【呆】【了】，【还】【担】【心】【这】【么】【漂】【亮】【的】【婚】【纱】【自】【己】【撑】【不】【起】，【可】【不】【想】，【就】【像】【是】【专】【门】【为】【她】【制】【作】
【此】【时】【此】【刻】【的】【冥】【九】【黎】，【脑】【海】【中】【只】【有】【一】【个】【想】【法】，【杀】！ 【自】【己】【这】【般】【让】【凤】【青】【璇】【不】【那】【么】【特】【殊】，【让】【她】【得】【到】【将】【士】【们】【的】【信】【任】，【告】【诉】【长】【老】【会】【凰】【九】【倾】【的】【女】【儿】【被】【她】【放】【了】【出】【去】，【就】【是】【为】【了】【不】【让】【她】【最】【终】【沦】【为】【冥】【界】【与】【外】【面】【五】【界】【的】【炮】【灰】。 【可】【是】，【他】【当】【着】【自】【己】【的】【面】【伤】【害】【怀】【中】【的】【女】【人】【也】【就】【算】【了】，【而】【且】【还】【想】【将】【她】【身】【上】【的】【特】【殊】【无】【限】【放】【大】，【痴】【人】【说】【梦】。 【冥】【九】二码和八数“【起】【立】！”【班】【长】【看】【到】【老】【师】【进】【来】【了】【之】【后】【开】【始】【喊】。 “【老】【师】【好】！”【每】【个】【人】【都】【歪】【歪】【扭】【扭】【的】【说】【出】【了】【这】【句】【话】，【每】【个】【人】【都】【瞬】【间】【紧】【绷】【了】【起】【来】，【很】【多】【人】【都】【开】【始】【找】【他】【们】【要】【找】【的】【卷】【子】。 【昨】【天】【刚】【留】【了】【一】【套】【卷】【子】，【看】【来】【这】【节】【课】【要】【讲】【了】。 【所】【有】【人】【的】【心】【声】【大】【多】【都】【是】【这】【一】【句】【话】，【瞬】【间】【他】【们】【慌】【了】，【不】【光】【是】【他】【们】，【陆】【源】【殊】【也】【慌】【了】。 【心】【里】【止】【不】【住】【的】
【写】【这】【本】【书】【的】【初】【衷】，【有】【没】【有】【想】【出】【成】【绩】【呢】？【大】【概】【是】【有】【一】【点】【的】。 【不】【过】【最】【开】【始】【我】【最】【纯】【粹】【的】【想】【法】，【是】【通】【过】【这】【本】【书】，【找】【到】【自】【己】【身】【上】【的】【问】【题】，【然】【后】【一】【个】【个】【解】【决】【掉】。 【它】【是】【一】【个】【心】【理】【治】【疗】【的】【过】【程】。 【所】【以】【在】【书】【里】【会】【有】【怼】【小】【混】【混】【和】【拉】【着】【全】【家】【人】【成】【长】【的】【情】【节】，【也】【有】【各】【种】【认】【识】【自】【身】【错】【误】【并】【不】【断】【改】【正】【的】【情】【节】，【还】【会】【有】【死】【亡】【焦】【虑】【的】【情】【节】。
【张】【灯】【结】【彩】，【就】【连】【人】【间】【都】【开】【始】【下】【起】【了】【花】【瓣】【雨】。 【仙】【界】【的】【这】【一】【次】【喜】【宴】，【可】【谓】【是】【人】【山】【人】【海】，【热】【闹】【非】【凡】。 【所】【有】【的】【一】【切】【都】【仿】【佛】【做】【梦】【一】【般】，【往】【事】【也】【如】【梦】【一】【般】，【留】【下】【的】【除】【了】【记】【忆】，【伤】【痛】【和】【喜】【悦】，【还】【有】【不】【得】【已】【的】【成】【熟】。 【黛】【瑟】【看】【着】【天】【华】【牵】【着】【天】【琼】【的】【手】【过】【来】【时】，【就】【迫】【不】【及】【待】【的】【走】【到】【了】【天】【华】【身】【边】。 【她】【先】【蹲】【下】【来】【摸】【了】【摸】【天】【琼】【的】【小】【脑】【袋】